PEER-REVIEW-POLICY

At Kalyani BioAxis, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and scientific rigor. To ensure the quality of our published research, all submitted manuscripts undergo a thorough peer review process. The peer review process is double-blind, meaning that both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other, ensuring impartiality and fairness.

  1. Reviewer Selection
    Manuscripts are assigned to reviewers who are experts in the relevant field of research. We strive to maintain diversity in reviewer backgrounds, ensuring that the manuscript is evaluated from multiple perspectives.

  2. Review Criteria
    Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on several criteria:
  • Scientific originalityand novelty of the research.
  • Relevanceto healthcare applications, particularly in primary and secondary care.
  • Methodological rigorand statistical analysis.
  • Clarity and readability, ensuring that the findings are easily understood.
  • Ethical considerations, especially in clinical and medical research.

    1. Reviewer Feedback
      Reviewers are asked to provide constructive feedback on the manuscript, suggesting revisions or improvements where necessary. These suggestions are then communicated to the authors to enhance the quality of the manuscript.

    2. Final Decision
      Based on the feedback from reviewers, the handling editor makes an initial decision: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. Authors are provided with clear, actionable feedback on how to improve their manuscripts. The editorial team reserves the right to make the final decision based on the revisions submitted.

Ethical Compliance
Kalyani BioAxis adheres to a strict ethical policy in research publication. Manuscripts involving human or animal subjects must meet ethical standards set by the relevant authorities. Ethical approval, consent forms, and declarations are required to be submitted alongside research studies.